pressconnects.com Weather Jobs Cars Homes Apartments Classifieds Shopping Dating
 search
Customer Service: Subscribe Now | Pay Bill | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Jobs With Us
Newssportsbusinessentertainmentlifestylenationobituariesopiniontravel
Wednesday June 27, 2007
NEWS
IBM workers' records pushed for TCE study
Researcher cites worldwide interest

Related news from the Web
Latest headlines by topic:
• Lymphoma 
• Health 

Powered by Topix.net

By Tom Wilber
Press & Sun-Bulletin

A Boston University professor who used IBM records to track cancer deaths among workers in San Jose, Calif., told Endicott residents Tuesday there is worldwide interest in a similar study proposed by federal officials for workers at the Endicott plant.

Richard Clapp, professor of environmental health and a national authority on chemical exposure, encouraged employees and advocates to work with scientists from the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health to develop the study.

The plan calls for using 28,000 IBM personnel records and cancer registry data to determine whether Endicott employees suffered disproportionately from cancer. The outcome could lead to knowledge necessary for safer manufacturing practices, Clapp said.

"People around the world watch this," said Clapp, speaking to between 40 and 50 people at the First United Methodist Church on McKinley Avenue in Endicott.

He reviewed his own study, part of a 2002 lawsuit against IBM claiming deaths related to toxic exposure on the job in San Jose. His data showed workers suffered significantly elevated deaths from "cancers consistent with solvent exposure," including kidney cancer, brain cancer and non-Hodgkins lymphoma.

While IBM prevailed in court, Clapp's study was published in Environmental Health, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and has led to continued interest in the subject.

IBM did not cooperate with the Clapp study -- based on a "mortality file" documenting employees who received death benefits -- until the court ordered that the document be turned over. Advocates of the Endicott study should expect the same resistance, he added.

NIOSH -- being a federal agency working on behalf of the general public -- is better positioned to leverage cooperation, he said. Although the agency has the legal authority to subpoena records, "the whole thing could come to a halt" in the face of stiff IBM resistance, he added.

"Every step of the way is a battle," he said. "I would urge you to make sure there is some way NIOSH uses its legal authority to get the information it needs."

Ari Fishkind, a spokesman for IBM, could not be reached Tuesday evening. In the past, he has said IBM is cooperating with NIOSH.

In a report examining the feasibility of the Endicott study, NIOSH officials raised the possibility of IBM resistance preventing a comprehensive study.

StoryChat Post a CommentPost a Comment   View all CommentsView All Comments

Obviously Professor Clapp has an axe to grind. His data supporting a lawsuit in San Jose, California was not adequate to get a win in the lawsuit. He would like to see another try. You might note that the primary interest of most people is to win lawsuits and make big money, not to understand mortality rates vs chemical exposure.

There are many industries where employees get some exposure to chemicals and most businesses follow Federal Guidelines from OSHA to follow safe practices. IBM has abandoned the use of other chemicals, or has developed safer chemical processes, to keep its workers safe, often beyond OSHA guidelines. This type of study does not provide direct correlation between chemical use and disease development.

Those who think that evidence will be developed to support a lawsuit are most probably mistaken. Several facts mitigate against finding damning information and one is not IBM not cooperating. One, ever since this issue was raised 15-20 years ago among semiconductor manufacturers IBM has provided study data to an industry based report. Two, IBM has done several internal studies of its own to either find a problem or not. Three,they tightened up their safety practices even though they found, as reported to employees, no significant exposure problems from following safety procedures. Four, as a result of employee concerns, and lawsuits, ala San Jose, I'm sure they have reviewed all the other data taken and found no useful correlation themselves that would definitively connect TCE with illnesses. So, they are cooperating.

When you advise people to spend our tax dollars on another chemical hunt in industry and the illness of interest is cancer, please go look up a table of potential carcinogens and see how many you are exposed to everyday. You might be surprised. And since most contact diseases result from an act of 'fate', ie. 1 in 100,000 get it, there is no way to know which carcinogen caused someone's illness. Without very high correlation coefficients between exposure at work and illness, not even a good guess can be made. I doubt such data is available in IBMs studies.

I can see the lobby for the study is looking for the long term - a lawsuit.

Posted by: glenn guhman on Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:56 am

Anyone reading this article can make a difference by contacting the below addresses and simply ask that NIOSH conduct the cancer study on IBM workers exposed to chemicals. You can also offer input to help structure the study if you would like to recomend ideas to make the study more effective or address particular issues.

Email Dr. Lynne Pinkerton of NIOSH at niocindocket@cdc.gov or access http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/review/public/103/. Or US postal mail address: NIOSH Docket Office, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS, C-34, Cincinnati, OHIO 45226.

Posted by: jli2533838 on Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:23 am

Post a CommentPost a Comment   View all CommentsView All Comments


 News index

Print this article     Email this to a friend     Subscribe Now     Search our archives

     

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

Partners: Jobs: CareerBuilder.com | Cars: cars.com | Apartments: apartments.com | Shopping: ShopLocal.com


Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Pay Bill | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Jobs With Us


Copyright © 2007 Binghamton Press & Sun-Bulletin
All rights reserved. Users of this site agree to the Terms of Service
and Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Rights, updated March 2007.
Problem with this site? Please contact the webmaster.
Gannett New York network: Binghamton | Elmira | Ithaca | Poughkeepsie | Rochester | Utica | Westchester
GannettUSA Today USA WeekendGannett Foundation